YOUR 3 CENTS WEB POLL
Campaign Spending: Do you agree with the Supreme Court's decision removing the limits on campaign spending by corporations and unions?
| 17.14% | Yes | |
| 82.85% | No |
Comment: In my opinion this would only open the door to more corruption than there already is in the political arena. from Ft. Walton Beach, FL by Mildred
Comment: This is why the average American can't get their views heard in Washington, D.C. We have no way of knowing if our votes count for or against an issue because of the debt owed to wealthy campaign contributors. We need some of those billions of dollars to update America's road, bridge,and utility infrastructure and maybe when people get new jobs, the economy and healthcare crisis' can improve. from Pensacola/Florida by Katonya
Comment: If we can not trust the supreme court puppets, who can we trust? Who else wants to own a politician? from pensacola/Fla by kim
Comment: Politicans linr thier pockets we get sold down the river. We need term limits for congressmen and represenitives. We need to vote out everone that puts special intrests and themselves before us. from milton fl by dale
Comment: Today have to most Corrupt Government in U.S. History. In the future if a candidate is supported by big business and the unions, I will vote against that person because the Unions and the Big Businesses are looking for big favors in return. I want to vote for the candidate that supports the people. from Milton by John
Comment: This is is just another way for large CORP. To control Goverment with the poltican in their pockets. from Jay Fl by Faye
Comment: freedom of speech? you got to be kidding me! its called buying and dictating policies...you guys want to know the main reason why this nation is going down the drain and the gap between the haves and have nots have widened...because of these republican appointed judges who cater to their "corp. friends"...i guess the old system of slavery will be back soon...its called "fiefdom"! from p'cola fl by h
Comment: Corporations and unions cannot vote, therefore they should be barred from campaign "donations" (read "payoffs"). from Cantonment, Fl. by Jeff
Comment: Our last great bastion of sense has gone to err on the side of utter lunacy. Running a political campaign is an individuals' decesion. As an individual decesion, it is also inherent with that decesion that one would have the individual collateral to run and maintain such an endeavor. What ever happened to the concept of standing on one's own two feet? from Mary Esther, FL. by Tom
BUSINESS NEWS
Unemployment aid applications near a 4-year low
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The number of people seeking unemployment aid neared a four-year low last week, a positive sign that strong hiring could continue in the coming months.
CONSUMER INFO
Looking for work? There may be an app for that
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- Looking for a promising career in a lousy economy? A new study suggests you're apt to find it in the apps built for smartphones, computer tablets and Facebook's online social network. ...
SCIENCE/TECH NEWS
IN THE NEWS: SUING TO STOP GOOGLE
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- A consumer watchdog group wants to keep Google from making sweeping changes to its privacy policies next month.


